

The concept of best execution in MiFID II is a lot broader then under MiFID I. MiFID II and MiFIR includes the following additional requirements:
It’s clear that with the widening of the product scope, the burden to provide best execution becomes heavier. This is because the liquidity drivers are different between asset classes, e.g. most shares are priced throughout the day, a lot of bonds are not. Another problem is that derivatives are not fungible. This means that, as an example, an option bought on EUREX cannot be sold on Euronext. Criteria under MiFID I the following execution factors needed to be taken into account:
These factors did not change under MIFID II. However, an investment firm under MIFID I had to take reasonable steps, under MIFID II it is required to take sufficient steps to provide best execution. This means that proof of best execution needs to be data driven and available at all times for the client and the regulator. Beside aforementioned execution factors the following information and procedures are required:
In order to comply with MiFID II AFS upgraded their execution procedures and designed in-house software named AFS BEST (Best Execution Solutions (MiFID) Two) to fulfill and record all the MiFID II execution requirements.